![]() ![]() In Virtual DJ 2023 you can choose the model: old Stem 1.0 spleeter model or enhanced new Stems 2.0 own Vitual Dj model (no more spleeter.)Īnother solution: give the possibility to create a. Just add an option " low stems quality - spleeter model" for old computer, and "advanced stems quality - tensorflow enhanced model like Serato 3.0.4 stems or Virtualdj 2.0 stems". The argument of CPU usage in Rekordbox 6.7 stems, can be solved is arbitrated as did the latest version of VirtualDJ 2023. I don't know anything about the technical side about how stems algorithms work, but I feel like, if you would make it 4 separations instead of 3 (like Serato does it), it might result in better quality of the individual stems. Without the ability to analyze tunes outside of a mix and being able to save the results, I don't think any sane DJ would use this, even if you improve the quality. But I don't feel like that is a requirement you should set, when most people run rekordbox on a laptop. I understand that analyzing takes some time, and will probably be much faster, if I had a better system. ![]() Because they have to be analyzed aswell, ofcourse. The analyzing also takes too long, and it even takes longer if I load more tunes into other decks. And the results aren't saved anywhere, so I'd have to analyze the tune again, if I load it in again. And it is the main reason for me why I won't be able to use this.Īnalyzing the stems only works on the fly, while a tune is loaded into one of the decks. The implementation is more bothering than the quality of the algorithm. It feels so obvious that you probably already know yourself that this needs to be improved. ![]() I'm not gonna say much about the quality. Really happy that this feature arrived in rekordbox, and that it is available to me, with my DDJ400 license. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |